Roxanne Pompilio
  • Home
  • About Roxanne Pompilio
    • Contact
  • EDL 650
  • EDL655
  • EDL 795A
  • EDL 640
  • EDL 690
  • EDL 680
    • EDL680 Assignments
  • EDL 610
    • Habits
    • Culture
    • Platform
  • EDL 630 Blog
  • EDL 630—Learning and Discovery—Making Wine Jam (20% Project)
    • Preliminary Research for Inquiry Questions, Revisions, & Recipes
    • History of Jams, Jellies, Marmalade and Cannning
    • Purchasing the Right Tools
    • Jam Making 101—My First Attempt at Making Grape Wine Jam
    • Jam Making 101—Second Attempt at Making Grape Wine Jam and First Canning
    • 20% Project—Final Reflection and Memories
    • Diigo Research—20 Percent Project
  • EDL 630 Final Project—Plagues that Changed History
  • EDL 621 Gamification
Social Media

Enterprise
ARchitecture

Exploration of methods and strategies for maximizing the effectiveness of technology in an educational setting.

Enterprise Architecture

Reflecting on Enterprise Architecture frameworks—Module 3

2/8/2015

3 Comments

 
This week I was asked to focus on Enterprise Architecture Frameworks (EAFs). Enterprise Architecture and its frameworks are still relatively new for me. What follows is a chart that represents what I know about Enterprise Architecture Frameworks, what I would like to know, and what I have learned since beginning of my exploration. 
K.W.L Chart—Enterprise Architecture Frameworks
Summary

In the past ten years, Enterprise Architecture (EA) has gained wide used within many businesses and in government organizations. Given the growing demands in today’s globalized work environment, Enterprise Architecture Frameworks (EAFs) are continuing to grow in popularity. Many businesses and organizations are using “hybrids” of these models or are customizing them to meet and adapt to the needs of their stakeholders. Educational institutions are also starting to implement EA frameworks as well.

Cameron and McMillan’s (2013) work is a good starting point for understanding the history of EA frameworks. Their review of the literature provides an overview of the five major EAFs. These include the Zachman Framework, which is considered to be one of the first frameworks for EA, The Open Group Architectural Framework (TOGAF), which is based on the Department of Defense’s Technical Architecture Framework for Information Management, the Department of Defense Architecture Framework (Do DAF), which focuses on operations, systems, and technical standards, the Federal Enterprise Architecture Framework (FEAF), which places the organization and sharing of federal information as a priority function, and the Gartner Framework, which involves a continuous, on-going process.

Urbaczewski and Mrdalj’s (2006) add to the work of Cameron and McMillian by drawing comparisons between the EA frameworks developed and also include attention to the Treasury Enterprise Architecture Framework (TEAF), which is designed to address the interrelationships among all of its organizations to manage all of its IT resources. Their comparison of the EA frameworks suggests that each of the frameworks differs by the stakeholders needs addressed and also offers guidance for determining the best EAF to meet the criteria for each organization.

Since the current EA frameworks were developed with either specific needs in mind or might not meet the growing needs of organizations, a “hybrid” or customized version of an existing EA framework might be needed for educational institutions, as it might afford greater flexibility. Although further research is needed, the TOGAF and Zachman EA frameworks appear to be the frameworks to build upon. Finally, according to the literature so far, all of the existing frameworks are weak in addressing the maintenance of an information system. This seems to be an area where more work is needed. In terms of adoption of EA frameworks by educational institutions, the present challenge rests with the sequence, process, and transition from individual systems to full implementation of EA.


References:

Bernard, Scott A. (2012-08-13). An Introduction to Enterprise Architecture: Third Edition (Kindle Locations 487-488). AuthorHouse. Kindle Edition.

Cameron & McMillan, 2013.  Analyzing the Current Trends in Enterprise Architecture Frameworks.  Journal of Enterprise Architecture.  http://ea.ist.psu.edu/documents/journal_feb2013_cameron_2.pdf

Urbaczewski & Mrdalj, 2006. A comparison of Enterprise Architecture Frameworks.  Eastern Michigan University.  http://iacis.org/iis/2006/Urbaczewki_Mrdalj.pdf

3 Comments
Sara Chai
2/8/2015 09:45:05 pm

Roxanne, your summary helps me continue to gain understanding about enterprise architecture. I appreciate your sharing. Your writing is scholarly yet very readable. I am thankful to learn with you about this!

Reply
Roxanne Pompilio
2/9/2015 01:47:45 pm

Thanks Sara for your kind and thoughtful comments. I'm happy I'm readable. I have often been accused of being too abstract. I'm probably my worst critic. It is probably good that we don't have a lot of time to complete some of these assignments or I'd find myself still revising. One of my regrets in life is having the opportunity to publish part of my M.A. thesis in political science and not doing so. What made the work interesting was a synthesis of my 200 page thesis into about 25-30 pages. After several revisions, I never finished it. I managed to condense it to a 30 page paper for publication, but when asked to do one last revision I couldn't do it.

Reply
https://www.rhinoarchschool.com/ link
8/5/2020 05:03:12 am

Wonderful architecture thoughts and updating great designs always, the more skills I have found here and getting the more methods. You can follow the blog and get wonderful rhino tips.

Reply



Leave a Reply.

    Author

    Desire for knowledge and insight

    Archives

    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015

    Categories

    All

    RSS Feed

Proudly powered by Weebly